| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
SMTP Security Issues (Page 2 of 2) Common SMTP Server Security Techniques Despite this obvious problem, efforts to implement a general security mechanism in SMTP have been resisted for two main reasons. First, there is no foolproof way to retrofit a new security mechanism onto something as widely used as SMTP without creating incompatibilities between newer and older systems. Second, many administrators were reluctant to completely do away with the general notion of cooperation between sites that has helped make the Internet so successful, simply due to a few bad apples. Still, something had to be done. The compromise was for system administrators to tighten up their SMTP servers through the imposition of both technical and policy changes. Naturally, these vary from one organization to another. Some of the more common SMTP security provisions include:
Because of all the abuse in recent years, you will find that most SMTP servers implement these or other features, even though most of those features are not formally defined by the SMTP standards. They are instead enhancements built into individual SMTP server software packages. Some of these measures can actually get quite sophisticated. For example, the SMTP server run by pair Networks, the great Web hosting company I have used for years, uses POP-before-SMTP authentication. This means that before the server will accept outgoing mail from the user via SMTP, the user must first log in to check incoming mail using the Post Office Protocol. Since POP includes authentication, successful POP login tells the server the user is authorized. This flips a switch in the server that allows the user to access the SMTP service after that login for a limited period of time. If this seems convoluted, well, you start to get an idea of the hassle that spammers and hackers have created for Internet service providers today. It's also worth noting that SMTP does not include any mechanism for encryption to ensure the privacy of e-mail transmissions. Users requiring security in who sees their messages must use a separate encryption scheme to encode the body of the message prior to submission.
Home - Table Of Contents - Contact Us The TCP/IP Guide (http://www.TCPIPGuide.com) Version 3.0 - Version Date: September 20, 2005 © Copyright 2001-2005 Charles M. Kozierok. All Rights Reserved. Not responsible for any loss resulting from the use of this site. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||