| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
IP Message Fragmentation Process (Page 1 of 4) When an IP datagram is too large for the maximum transmission unit (MTU) of the underlying data link layer technology used for the next leg of its journey, it must be fragmented before it can be sent across the network. The higher-layer message to be transmitted is not sent in a single IP datagram but rather broken down into pieces called fragments that are sent separately. In some cases, the fragments themselves may need to be fragmented further. Fragmentation is necessary to implement a network-layer internet that is independent of lower layer details, but introduces significant complexity to IP. Remember that IP is an unreliable, connectionless protocol. IP datagrams can take any of several routes on their way from the source to the destination, and some may not even make it to the destination at all. When we fragment a message we make a single datagram into many, which introduces several new issues to be concerned with:
To address these concerns and allow the proper reassembly of the fragmented message, IP includes several fields in the IP format header that convey information from the source to the destination about the fragments. Some of these contain a common value for all the fragments of the message, while others are different for each fragment.
Home - Table Of Contents - Contact Us The TCP/IP Guide (http://www.TCPIPGuide.com) Version 3.0 - Version Date: September 20, 2005 © Copyright 2001-2005 Charles M. Kozierok. All Rights Reserved. Not responsible for any loss resulting from the use of this site. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||