Please Whitelist This Site?

I know everyone hates ads. But please understand that I am providing premium content for free that takes hundreds of hours of time to research and write. I don't want to go to a pay-only model like some sites, but when more and more people block ads, I end up working for free. And I have a family to support, just like you. :)

If you like The TCP/IP Guide, please consider the download version. It's priced very economically and you can read all of it in a convenient format without ads.

If you want to use this site for free, I'd be grateful if you could add the site to the whitelist for Adblock. To do so, just open the Adblock menu and select "Disable on tcpipguide.com". Or go to the Tools menu and select "Adblock Plus Preferences...". Then click "Add Filter..." at the bottom, and add this string: "@@||tcpipguide.com^$document". Then just click OK.

Thanks for your understanding!

Sincerely, Charles Kozierok
Author and Publisher, The TCP/IP Guide


NOTE: Using software to mass-download the site degrades the server and is prohibited.
If you want to read The TCP/IP Guide offline, please consider licensing it. Thank you.

The Book is Here... and Now On Sale!

The whole site in one document for easy reference!
The TCP/IP Guide

Custom Search







Table Of Contents  The TCP/IP Guide
 9  TCP/IP Lower-Layer (Interface, Internet and Transport) Protocols (OSI Layers 2, 3 and 4)
      9  TCP/IP Internet Layer (OSI Network Layer) Protocols
           9  Internet Protocol (IP/IPv4, IPng/IPv6) and IP-Related Protocols (IP NAT, IPSec, Mobile IP)
                9  IP Network Address Translation (NAT) Protocol

Previous Topic/Section
IP Network Address Translation (NAT) Protocol
Previous Page
Pages in Current Topic/Section
1234
5
Next Page
IP NAT Address Terminology
Next Topic/Section

IP NAT Overview, Motivation, Advantages and Disadvantages
(Page 5 of 5)

Disadvantages of NAT

The above are all good reasons to use NAT, but there are drawbacks to the technique as well. Some of these take away part of the benefit in certain items in the list above:

  • Complexity: NAT represents one more complexity in setting up and managing the network. It also makes troubleshooting more confusing due to address substitutions.

  • Problems Due to Lack of Public Addresses: Certain functions won't work properly due to lack of a “real” IP address in the client host machines.

  • Compatibility Problems With Certain Applications: I said above that NAT was only mostly transparent. There are in fact compatibility issues with certain applications that arise because NAT “tinkers” with the IP header fields in datagrams but not in the application data. This means tools like FTP, which pass IP addresses and port numbers in commands, must be specially handled, and some applications may not work.

  • Problems With Security Protocols: Protocols like IPSec are designed to detect modifications to headers and commonly balk at the changes that NAT makes, since they cannot differentiate those changes from malicious datagram “hacking”. It is still possible to combine NAT and IPSec, but this becomes more complicated.

  • Poor Support for Client Access: The lack of a public IP address for each client is a double-edged sword; it protects against hackers trying to access a host but also makes it difficult for legitimate access to clients on the local network. “Peer-to-peer” applications are harder to set up, and something like an organizational web site (accessed from the Internet as a whole) usually needs to be set up without NAT.

  • Performance Reduction: Each time a datagram transitions between the private network and the Internet, an address translation is required. In addition, other work must be done as well, such as recalculating header checksums. Each individual translation takes little effort but when you add it up, you are giving up some performance.

Many organizations feel that the advantages outweigh the disadvantages, especially if they do use the Internet in primarily a client/server fashion, as most do. For this reason NAT has become quite popular. One should always bear in mind, however, that the main problem that led to NAT is lack of address space. IPv6 fixes this problem, while NAT merely finds a clever “workaround” for it. For this reason, many people consider NAT a “kludge”. Once IPv6 is deployed, it will no longer be needed, and some folks don't like it even for IPv4. On the other hand, some feel its other benefits make it worthy of consideration even in IPv6.

Note: A “kludge” (or “kluge”) is something that is used to address a problem in an inelegant way, like hammering a nail using the side of an adjustable wrench. (I would never do such a thing, of course not…)



Previous Topic/Section
IP Network Address Translation (NAT) Protocol
Previous Page
Pages in Current Topic/Section
1234
5
Next Page
IP NAT Address Terminology
Next Topic/Section

If you find The TCP/IP Guide useful, please consider making a small Paypal donation to help the site, using one of the buttons below. You can also donate a custom amount using the far right button (not less than $1 please, or PayPal gets most/all of your money!) In lieu of a larger donation, you may wish to consider purchasing a download license of The TCP/IP Guide. Thanks for your support!
Donate $2
Donate $5
Donate $10
Donate $20
Donate $30
Donate: $



Home - Table Of Contents - Contact Us

The TCP/IP Guide (http://www.TCPIPGuide.com)
Version 3.0 - Version Date: September 20, 2005

Copyright 2001-2005 Charles M. Kozierok. All Rights Reserved.
Not responsible for any loss resulting from the use of this site.